Marketing Communication. Capital at Risk. 

Amid rising geopolitical tensions, Europe finds itself at a critical juncture in its security strategy. Long reliant on American military support, European Union (EU) nations now confront the urgent need to assume greater responsibility for their own defence as the new U.S. administration signals a strategic shift in defence policy. [i] This shift could compel EU nations to significantly expand their military budgets.[ii]

In the first few months of 2025, some major European nations and the European Commission have announced substantial defence spending programs, totalling hundreds of billions of dollars, aimed at strengthening military capabilities through 2030. EU member states, which were estimated to have spent over €326 billion on defence in 2024, are projected to increase expenditures by another €100 billion in real terms by 2027.[iii]

As Europe advances toward greater military self-sufficiency, global defence expenditures may continue to rise, with potentially a particular focus on advanced defence technologies over the next five years. As spending works its way through the value chain, international defence stocks, especially in Europe, could benefit.

Key Takeaways

• The new U.S. administration signals a strategic shift in its defence policy, prioritising efficiency and technology leadership.
• Many European nations are compelled to take greater responsibility for their own security. Europe’s rearmament appears to be a short-term reaction but a structural shift in defence policy.[iv]
• The digital transformation of defence might still be in its early innings, with enormous ground to cover, particularly in Europe. Warfare increasingly relies on AI, cybersecurity, and real-time data.[v]

A Shifting Global Landscape

The global defence landscape remains highly volatile, with nearly 30 major conflicts ongoing worldwide, according to the Council on Foreign Relations[vi]. Against this backdrop, the new U.S. administration’s 'America-first' stance, coupled with direct negotiations with Russia over the Ukraine war, is forcing Europe to reassess its defence strategy. Many European nations are now acknowledging decades of underinvestment in defence, with some already committing to increased spending.[vii]

Meanwhile, the new Trump-administration is pursuing a bold defence strategy domestically, aiming to cut waste while modernising its military capabilities with AI, autonomous weapons, drones, and robotics. Budget freed from legacy programs is expected to further accelerate defence modernisation efforts, which could benefit key defence technology providers[viii].

These advancements are not occurring in isolation. As the U.S. modernises its military capabilities, other nations could well feel compelled to strengthen their own defence technology arsenals. This momentum, compounded by Europe’s commitments, could drive total global defence spending higher through 2030.[ix]

Europe’s Defence Budgets Potentially Set for Secular Expansion

Prior to the new U.S. administration’s defence messaging, Europe had already been undergoing a historic rearmament phase, with defence budgets expanding at a pace not seen since the Cold War.[x] For example, European military budgets grew 10% in 2023 to €279 billion, marking the ninth consecutive year of growth.[xi]

Additionally, National Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) European members are expected to add $100 billion in new defence spending between 2022 and 2024.[xii] By the end of 2024, at least 20 NATO members are expected to meet or exceed the 2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) defence spending target, up from only 9 members in 2021.[xiii][xiv] Germany, France, and Poland are leading the spending surge, with Germany’s military budget expanding by 25% to roughly €86 billion in 2024 alone, making it the world’s third-largest defence spender behind the U.S. and China.[xv]

Despite the urgency, some European nations still lag other military powers in terms of defence expenditure as a percentage of GDP. The region’s defence spending commitments are growing, but they remain far below the new ambitions set by NATO’s leadership and key members, meaning further spending growth could remain ahead. Recent spending initiatives potentially signal momentum in this direction.

EU Defence Spending as a Percentage of GDP Lags Major Military Spending Nations

Sources: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute via World Bank Group. Military expenditure (as a % of GDP). Accessed on Feb 18, 2025.

Note: Data as of 2023

Additional Potential Developments in 2025 Boosting European Defence:

• The UK’s Defence Overhaul: The UK has launched a new defence unit to oversee £20 billion in military spending. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has set out the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War, suggesting a rise to 2.5% of GDP.[xvi]
• Rearm Europe Initiative: The European Union unveiled an €800bn defence initiative, dubbed Rearm Europe, to strengthen its military capabilities. The plan includes €150bn in loans to member states and aims to unlock private investment in defence technology.[xvii] This follows NATO secretary General Mark Rutte’s remarks that the alliance’s spending target would be “considerably more than 3%” of GDP, up from the 2% target currently.[xviii]
• Germany Defence Spending: Germany will exempt military spending from its strict fiscal rules and create an off-budget fund of €500 billion to finance infrastructure spending, laying the ground for a big boost in the country’s defence budget.[xix]
• Paris Emergency Summit: In response to concerns over U.S. military aid reductions to Ukraine, European leaders convened an emergency summit, committing to unlocking billions of euros for defence. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk emphasised that defence spending will no longer be treated as excessive expenditure.[xx]
• Surge in Private Defence Investment: European private sector investment in defence, security, and resilience jumped 24% year-over-year (YoY), reflecting growing interest in military modernisation.[xxi]

Moreover, new equipment procurement and development remains central of Europe’s defence expenditure growth. In 2024, the budget spent on new equipment procurement is expected to have reached beyond €90 billion, nearly 50% higher compared to 2023, and nearly 27% of the total budget. Similarly, spending on research and development grew 18% YoY in 2024 to €13 billion. This expansion could continue over the next few years, signalling a broad effort to modernise defence capabilities.[xxii]           

EU Member States Defence Expenditures Display Sharp Growth Post 2020

Source: Council of the European Union. (n.d.). EU defence in numbers, accessed on March 7, 2025.  

* Forecast.

Despite record military expenditures, in the U.S., defence remains one of the least digitised industries, with less than 1% of its military budget allocated to software and digital capabilities.[xxiii] The U.S. and its allies are recognising this gap, leading to an accelerated push toward AI, cybersecurity, and digital warfare.[xxiv]

Recent conflicts, such as those in Ukraine and the Middle East, have highlighted the critical advantages of technology - particularly real-time, data-driven decision-making, which could drive upgrades in defence software infrastructure. Beyond operational superiority, technology could also deliver cost advantages on the battlefield, reinforcing the strategic importance of defence tech solutions.[xxv] Worldwide, and in Europe, companies specialising in advanced defence systems and defence-tech infrastructure may be poised to potentially benefit from sustained investment.

Below, we highlight three European firms aiming to drive this transformation:

• Rheinmetall AG, Germany’s largest ammunition manufacturer, has experienced significant growth over the last few years, benefitting from increased European defence spending.[xxvi] The company recently signed its largest-ever framework contract with the German Armed Forces for the digitisation of infantry soldier-systems. The agreement, valued at up to EUR 3.1 billion, will run until the end of 2030.[xxvii]
• Thales SA, a French defence electronics giant, operates a defence business that accounts for over 50% of its revenues and almost 60% of profits.[xxviii] The company recently secured a £250 million contract for Royal Navy fleet communications and has expanded its cybersecurity division with the acquisition of Imperva.[xxix]^,[xxx]
• BAE Systems, UK’s leading defence and aerospace company, appears to have benefited from the surge in defence spending in EU countries since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, with orders for fighter jets, submarines, and frigates in high demand.[xxxi]  The company reported record sales revenue of £28.33 billion in 2024, up 14% YoY from 2023. The firm received new orders worth £33.7 billion last year, while the total of the company's existing backlog of orders increased by £8 billion, reaching £77.8 billion.[xxxii]

Conclusion: A Long Growth Runway for Defence Tech?

As global geopolitical uncertainty increases, defence spending could be set for secular expansion this decade. The U.S. realigning its strategic priorities could push Europe toward greater military self-reliance, driving increased procurement and benefiting some of the region’s largest defence contractors. Companies across the defence technology value chain - including software, components, hardware, drones, autonomy, and sensors - appear potentially positioned for sustained growth. For investors looking to capitalise on this generational transformation of the global defence order, a diversified global approach with a strong focus on defence technology may be key.

Important Information

Global X insights do not take into account a person’s own financial position or circumstances of any person or entity in any region or jurisdiction. This information should not be relied upon as a primary basis for any investment decision. Its applicability will depend on the particular circumstances of each investor. Any views and opinions are based on current market conditions and are subject to change. This information is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment research.

---